The Economics of Choosing the Right Career
Course Outline
The Economics of Choosing the Right Career
As many who entered the labor market following the Great Recession know all too well, graduating with a college degree does not mean you’ll easily fall into a good career. Four-year college graduates with entry-level jobs actually earned more in 2000 than they’re earning today and student loan debt burdens are higher than ever.
Does this mean you should skip college or drop-out? Not necessarily. Unemployment is still lower for those with undergraduate and higher degrees. However, understanding the economics behind the labor market will make finding a career a more manageable task.
The labor market in the United States has undergone many changes in the past few decades. Whereas we once had many manufacturing jobs that required little training or specialized skills, the labor market today demands more people who can work with computers and information technology.
Choosing a good career requires planning beyond getting a college education. You’ll want to carefully consider the career options available for your major, as well any specialized skills you’ll need to build outside of the classroom.
It’s also essential to understand how supply and demand affect your career options. How many people are also choosing that major vs. how many employers are looking for those skills? Is a particular career path susceptible to being replaced by a machine? What about outsourcing in the global labor market? What about laws and regulation – does it require an occupational license?
There’s a lot to think about! Choosing a career is a huge decision and understanding how supply and demand rule the labor market will help you better navigate your future.
Teacher Resources
Related to this course
See all Teacher Resources related to this course
Transcript
For individuals entering the labor market for the first time, there's some good news and some bad news. The good news is that the higher earners, or those with postgraduate degrees, are earning more than ever before. The bad news is this: In the year 2000, four-year college grads actually earned more with their entry jobs than they're earning today. Another way to put this problem is to think about taxi drivers. In the year 1970, only 1 out of 100 taxi drivers had a college degree. These days it's about 15 out of 100. Now having a college degree means you have a much lower chance of unemployment than if you don't finish college at all. But overall, what we see is a lot of waste of talent, of human capital -- people who finish college degrees but don't have the right skills to get the best jobs.
So, there's good and bad news from the labor market. How do we think about what's been driving it? Well, we should go back to the core economic concepts of supply and demand. That is, the supply and demand for labor. To think about how those supplies and demands have changed, let's start with the factor of technology. Technologies have changed, and this has altered supply and demand.
So, think about a lot of older jobs. They were based in manufacturing. You worked in a factory. Maybe you didn't need a college degree at all, but you didn't necessarily need that much fancy training. A lot of people could take these jobs and that helped build the American middle class. Today it's different. You're much more likely to work with computers and work with information technology. And this will affect both the supply and demand of different kinds of labor.
Let's think first about skilled labor. Well, skilled labor -- working with computers -- is much more powerful. The computer enhances the productivity of the skilled laborer. And information technology makes it possible for skilled labor to sell their products around the entire world. And that makes it possible for wages at the top to be higher. At the same time, with information technology, that can be pretty hard to learn. It can be pretty hard to keep up with all of the new developments. So, the supply there is more limited.
Now let's think about how computers interact with less-skilled labor. Well, less-skilled labor might find it harder to work with computers, but there's another factor -- the computer actually might be competing with you. So, in the old days, if you would have gotten a job as a clerk filing papers, well now we do that with software. If you might have gotten a job as a travel agent, a lot of those jobs have gone away. People just book online. So changing technology has made wages rise more at the top, but has held wages down for a lot of other jobs. And new college graduates are experiencing that when they go into the labor market.
The second factor of supply and demand has to do with the growth in global markets. Over the last 35 years, we've seen at least two billion new workers in global markets, often in China and in India, because those countries are now wealthier, freer and more open. Think about how this affects skilled labor. Let's say you're a worker really good at working with computers. Maybe you work at Apple, and you help design the iPhone.
Well, there's now a much bigger market -- the whole world -- you can sell to, and this means the value of your labor, and thus your wages, will be higher. At the same time, say you're a lesser-skilled worker. Well, there are now more people in the global economy you have to compete with. And a lot of them work pretty hard and they're being paid lower wages. So, if you don't have a special skill, you might find your job prospects aren't doing so well, because on the supply side, there's more competition for you.
A third set of factors has to do with slower economic growth, slower productivity growth and slower dynamism in the American economy. For instance, contrary to what you sometimes might hear or read, the number of start-ups in the American economy has been declining each decade since the 1980s. That means there are fewer new jobs. That means there is less of a demand for new labor, and that makes it harder for a new college graduate to get the job he or she wants at the right wage. When productivity growth is low, dynamism is lower, there is less turnover in jobs. And that can be fine if you're an incumbent who already has a great job, but if you're just starting off, that's going to make things for you tougher.
Another way in which labor markets have become more static is that more and more jobs now require what is now called occupational licensing, namely legal permission to do the job at all. Right now, over a quarter of the jobs in the United States require this kind of legal permission, often coming from a state or local government. It may make sense for some jobs, but should it really be the case that you need a legal license to be a barber, or to be an interior decorator? That increases the cost of entering those sectors, it means a lot of time and some money, to get the license. Again, it's good for the incumbents, who face less competition, but it's bad for people starting off in the labor market.
You put all of those factors together, and then what we had happen in this country was the Great Recession starting in 2008. This meant that output was declining, employment was declining. People were laid off. There was a financial crisis. What did a lot of employers do? Well, they froze their hiring. So again, if you were out there trying to get a new job these years, or immediately thereafter, it was harder. And we know from the data that people who start working during bad economic times -- it's slower for them to climb the future ladder of success. So even 5 years out,10 years out, they're earning lower wages or receiving fewer promotions than otherwise would have been the case. So, this has led to a persistent effect on American labor, which has limited opportunities.
So, to sum it all up, the labor market is more about skills than ever before. Yes, finishing college is a great idea, but these days it's no longer enough. What really matters is how much value you can produce for an employer. Labor markets are ruled by supply and demand, and supplies and demands are changing all the time. So, the way to think about how to do well in labor markets is to understand those supplies and those demands.
Take a look at the relative wages of, say, engineering majors versus psychology or communications majors. You might be surprised. In today's world, the momentum is moving toward people who are trained in information technology, who work well with computers and who can exploit growing global markets. When supply and demand are ruling labor markets, the people who do well are those who have an economic understanding of where is demand high, and where is supply scarce.
Subtitles
- English
- Spanish
- Chinese
- Hindi
Thanks to our awesome community of subtitle contributors, individual videos in this course might have additional languages. More info below on how to see which languages are available (and how to contribute more!).
How to turn on captions and select a language:
- Click the settings icon (⚙) at the bottom of the video screen.
- Click Subtitles/CC.
- Select a language.
Contribute Translations!
Join the team and help us provide world-class economics education to everyone, everywhere for free! You can also reach out to us at [email protected] for more info.
Submit subtitles
Accessibility
We aim to make our content accessible to users around the world with varying needs and circumstances.
Currently we provide:
- A website built to the W3C Web Accessibility standards
- Subtitles and transcripts for our most popular content
- Video files for download
Are we missing something? Please let us know at [email protected]
Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The third party material as seen in this video is subject to third party copyright and is used here pursuant
to the fair use doctrine as stipulated in Section 107 of the Copyright Act. We grant no rights and make no
warranties with regard to the third party material depicted in the video and your use of this video may
require additional clearances and licenses. We advise consulting with clearance counsel before relying
on the fair use doctrine.